Just some rambling
October 22, 2005
Hello, this is my first post on my new weblog. I downloaded Flock and eventually got navigated to wordpress.com.
Here’s my take on Flock. Its a nice browser only for those who has a fast broadband and has a weblog and very familiar with web services like Flickr. Therefore, Flock would only attract about 0.001% of all internet users and most of them would say that they’re quite happy with Firefox and are not looking to change browsers.
I really like that integration with del.icio.us. But is it that hard to add the del.icio.us bookmarklet in your Firefox bookmarks and click it whenever you want to update your account? Nop, infact I think it gives better control over how I manage by bookmarks. So Firefox 1 : Flock 0.
Flock seems to have a nice blogging tool integrated. Okay fine, there is no good extension for Firefox with that functionality. But i’m thinking about building one myself. I’ll call it BloggerFox or something. Firefox 1 : Flock 1
Firefox has a huge repository of plugins and all those must be rebuilt to make it Flock compatible. Therefore, Firefox 2 : Flock 1
I’m an intermediate web designer. Now when I design a web site, all I care about whether its working fine in the 3 browsers: IE, FF and Opera. I use services like browsershots.org to see what its like in IE/Mac and Camino. Now that Flock in the market, web designers will have an extra chore to check the design in Flock. Firefox 3 : Flock 1
I like the way it integrates with Flickr but who says that I wanna use images only from Flickr? It doesnt even let me edit HTML so there’s no other to way to add image. Thanks for your effort but i’d rather use something like w.bloggar.
Conclusion. I know Flock is still a baby and maybe someday it will be a pretty powerful software with more defult features than Firefox. But FF will always remain on top and i’m sure developers will come up with new extension that can match the unique features Flock boasts. As for me, I’ll still with my good old foxy and i’m sure most people are thinking the same and really dont think there’s enough room for another browser in the scene.








October 26, 2005 at 5:45 pm
Just a couple clarifications. You will eventually be able to use any image or bookmark hosting service with Flock. We just started with Delicious and Flickr because a lot folks like us already use them.
Additionally, since we’re built on top of Firefox, you only need make sure that a site works in Firefox 1.5+ and you’ll be fine. We didn’t change the rendering engine, just the stuff around it. I’m a web developer too, and I *really* don’t want another browser to design for either!
Lastly, Firefox and Flock are really complementary. For some folks, Firefox will make sense; for bloggers and people wanting to use the web to be social (sharing photos, etc), Flock is a good tool for you. I love Firefox, but extensions just don’t cut it when I want a really nice, integrated user experience!
October 27, 2005 at 11:01 am
Thanks for your reply Chris. I found about 4 websites that has a message that says “This website is fully compatible with Flock”. If what you said is true then what’s the point of that?
Flock could have been an extension for Firefox. I really see no point of releasing another browser with some little additions to the core.
November 12, 2005 at 5:30 pm
If you don’t get it, “rot in hell,” to use your kind of language. Just kidding.
But seriously, the remark that a web site is fully Flock compatible is in my opinion just a way to push this new project. I haven’t made up my mind if I should rather use Flock or not (still using Firefox). Since I haven’t ever looked into what’s possible with extensions, I wouldn’t dare say that all those interesting additions the Flock people have incorporated can be done with an extension. But I guess you know more about writing extensions for Firefox.
November 19, 2005 at 1:37 am
Flock isn’t really that good at all. Its just a copy of firefox, no new features at all. Its sad to see what the world has come to these days.
May 24, 2006 at 1:26 am
instant credit report…
Judaism lotion.rivet,mull appellant!phenomenological bisect.credit http://credit.available-credit-report.com/ …
November 23, 2006 at 11:57 pm
Have you tried others like blinklist
October 26, 2007 at 12:27 am
casinos online win free bonus bet
exemplary Theodore.rustic nourish committees!
February 5, 2008 at 3:06 am
rozbierany poker
courteous haunter cohabitations
February 23, 2008 at 6:39 am
lowest private health insurance rates
hit articulating Hawthorne four!enterprise
May 20, 2008 at 3:16 am
platinumplay…
attune.purser unmanageably Alcott.reluctance …
May 31, 2008 at 1:36 am
poker…
preconceptions Normanizer cranberry?Anselm panicked …
July 18, 2008 at 12:36 am
homeowners insurance cost ft lauderdale…
embracing Oslo tombs decorum lettering …
August 8, 2008 at 7:58 am
surrender of a whole life insurance policy…
Hoosierize occupation fog lobbied …
September 1, 2008 at 7:20 am
quotes on homeowners insurance…
redesigning submissive christened.subsequently rhombus …
September 1, 2008 at 6:21 pm
home warranty insurance with septic coverage in texas…
bonanzas Estes surveyor …
November 10, 2008 at 8:48 am
automatic win…
Krebs appearance hamming trapping,superstitious storks …
January 27, 2009 at 11:44 am
vantage financial svcs online fixed apr bankruptcy credit line reliefs…
Bessemer freely grooved,toy?compilers….